Refutation of Virology by Cytopathic Effect

We review the control experiments that was done by Dr Stefan Lanka. See his website for more - https://wissenschafftplus.de/

Dr Lanka’s control experiment refute the existence of disease-causing viruses. The experiments specifically target the cytopathic effect (CPE), which is the death of cells in a test tube, often considered evidence of viral activity.

Here's why Dr. Lanka's work is presented as praiseworthy:

• Refutation of Viral Claims: Dr. Lanka's control experiments are said to demonstrate that the CPE can be achieved without any infectious material. This directly challenges the fundamental basis of virology, which attributes CPE to viral presence and activity35. The document asserts that the cell death is actually caused by starvation and poisoning of the cells in the lab.

• Exposure of Scientific Misinterpretations: The document argues that virologists have misinterpreted the cytopathic effect. The document claims that this misinterpretation was solidified by the Nobel Prize awarded to John Franklin Enders in 1954. It notes that Enders himself cautioned that the effect should not be assumed as proof of a virus7. The document suggests that since then, control experiments that would have disproven Enders' hypothesis have been ignored.

• Unique and Necessary Experiments: The document claims that these control experiments are not being conducted by mainstream virologists. It mentions that Dr. Lanka and his team offered to carry out, document and publish these experiments together with other scientists, but they all refused. This highlights the importance and uniqueness of the work, and suggests that other scientists are unwilling to question the established paradigm. The document states that it is a "fatal mistake" to ignore these control experiments.

• Multiple Phases of Experimentation: The work is described as consisting of three phases of control experiments. The first phase focuses on the cytopathic effect, the second on the construction of the SARS-CoV-2 genome, and the third on structural analysis by sequence data. This suggests a thorough and comprehensive approach to questioning the existence of viruses.

• Relevance to Public Health: According to the document, Dr. Lanka's findings have significant implications for public health. It suggests that if viruses do not cause disease, then vaccines, tests, and measures to prevent transmission are ineffective and pointless.

• Evidence Provided: The document refers to published articles, correspondence with virologists and institutions, and a book series called "Die Zeitzeugen" that provide further details on the control experiments and related findings.

• Replication of results: The experiments described in the document included controls. In the case of the cytopathic effect, the results were replicated using different cell lines, and the experimenters were able to easily distinguish between stressed and control cultures.

In summary, the document suggests that Dr. Lanka's control experiments are a significant contribution to science, with profound implications for virology and public health. The document emphasizes that these experiments were not carried out by other scientists, and they refute the basic claims of virology. Therefore, the presenters should praise Dr. Lanka for his work, dedication and commitment to scientific truth and for exposing errors in accepted science.