Christine Massey authored a 42-page notarized affidavit, dated August 12, 2024, detailing the worldwide FOI collection and the unscientific nature of virology.
Based on numerous Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, many institutions worldwide have failed to provide records describing the isolation/purification of alleged viruses from any unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient. This investigation extends beyond just the "COVID-19 virus" (aka "SARS-COV-2") and also includes many of the so-called viruses on the childhood vaccine schedule.
Here is a summary of the institutions that failed to provide or cite records describing actual “SARS-COV-2” purification:
• Canada: 53 Canadian institutions, including the Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada, and the National Research Council of Canada, have not provided or cited any record describing the isolation of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” directly from a patient sample that was not first adulterated with other sources of genetic material.
• United States: Many institutions and offices, such as the CDC, NIH/NIAID, FDA, and various state health departments and universities, have failed to provide or cite records of "SARS-COV-2" purification. The CDC, in particular, has repeatedly failed to provide or cite any such record.
• China: An FOI request filed in China did not receive a response.
• International Organizations: The World Health Organization (WHO) failed to respond to an FOI-type query seeking records of "SARS-COV-2" purification. The Director of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Andrea Ammon, has admitted to having no documentation to prove that a virus exists, let alone proof of SARS-COV-2.
• Other Countries: Institutions in various other countries, including the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, Switzerland, Romania, Taiwan, Poland, Japan, Finland, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Serbia, Oregon, Colombia, Italy, Phillipines, Massachusetts, Spain, Sweden, Norway, Uruguay, Netherlands, Isle of Man, New Zealand, Australia, UK, Ireland, Denmark, and Argentina, have also failed to provide or cite records describing the purification of "SARS-COV-2".
The lack of purification records extends to many viruses for which childhood vaccinations are recommended. For example, some of the FOI’s request the same information for the following and yielded the same nothingburger results:
• SARS-COV-2
• SARS-COV-1
• Any common cold coronavirus
• Ebola
• HIV
• HPV
• Influenza
• Measles
• Polio
• Zika
• MERS
These FOI requests reveal that many health and science institutions lack records of virus isolation/purification, suggesting that virology may not be as scientifically sound as commonly believed. The scope of the FOI (Freedom of Information) requests regarding virus isolation, specifically "COVID-19 virus" (aka "SARS-COV-2"), is broad, seeking records from institutions worldwide that describe the isolation/purification of the alleged virus from any unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient. The requests were not limited to records of isolation performed or authored by the respective institution, but were open to any records describing "COVID-19 virus" isolation/purification performed by anyone, ever, anywhere on the planet.
The methodology of these FOI requests involves filing them to institutions in various countries, seeking records that describe the isolation/purification of the alleged "COVID-19 virus" from any unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient1. The purpose is to determine if the crucial step of isolation/purification has been performed, followed by characterization, sequencing, and controlled experiments1. Without this step, claims about the virus are considered speculation based on fraudulent science, tests, and diagnoses.
The "isolation" in virology often means the opposite of what it means in everyday English. Instead of purifying the virus directly from a patient sample, it involves mixing the sample with other sources of genetic material like monkey kidney cells and fetal bovine serum. This is not proper science, in any sense. Perhaps it is time to take a look at the foundational evidence for virology and the science behind vaccines and disease.
Christine Massey’s Website:
Settling the Virus Debate:
https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate/
Tom Cowan & Christine Massey on Viruses:
https://drtomcowan.com/blogs/podcasts/conversations-with-dr-cowan-friends-ep-44-christine-massey
Share this post