Furthermore, Mullis did NOT express doubts about PCR's use for "diagnosing viral diseases"!! Please CITE the SOURCE for THAT *EXACT* QUOTE from Mullis! HINT: you will NOT find any!
I am the only SCIENTIFICALLY LITERATE dissident from our old "AIDS" dissident movement who actually MET Mullis (a few times in fact) who is commenting on Mullis currently. I also helped to PRODUCE the very seminar where Mullis made those comments that are being MISINTERPRETED by simple-minded FOOLS in the present-day dissident movement!!
Hello Tammy and Bob, thanks for taking up my posts so diligently. I listened to your last post on DNA and this one of course. Let me start by making sure I am quite impressed with your work and what you try to fit in a 15-min podcast. You both speak VERY well.
Next let me paste here my exact comment on your DNA post
“Thanks, just listened to it. It’s a good quick overview but the devil’s in the details, literally. The link I pasted above requires patience to get thru as I’m not sure Tammy had made what is really closer to fraud than messy science crystal clear in this short talk. Debunking virology or nukes is easy-peasy compared to the DNA story. Regards.”
👉As you can see I was very positive about it and never once used the word, “superficial”, which can imply scanty. My calling it a “quick overview” is just that, you quickly went over as much as anyone can expect if you only have 15 min, and you actually covered some good ground. But it is a deep topic and since the actual basis of DNA is not even clear as you note yourselves, it has got to be more intentional manipulation than just messy science. Being the basis of so much of healthcare and bioscience the basis should be reconfirmed if the system was honest, but there is no modern reconfirmation of DNA structure and function, ergo some hidden hand seems to be holding that back.
☞How many people really have the time to read or even understand the full deal on DNA?
The conclusions I, Omar Jordan, Mia Breeze, and others made in my Mulls posts and the comment sections are NOT just based on lack of photo. It is based on the lack of photo, and as you said later the lack of papers (I think he had really only one biology paper even), and IMPORTANTLY almost total lack of any work history in bioscience.
Erlich is really the guy who made PCR into anything (though still possibly scammed it IDK for sure)
“This is an introduction to the methods and applications of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology, a technology developed by Erlich's group at Cetus…”
Also, to clarify, I never said these folks below were “scientists”. I said,
“Just to make sure no one feels left out, yes Yeadon, Kirsch, Martin, Kingston, Corbett & Broze, and others are also very talented thespians.”
Yeadon was a Pharma employee, Kirsch an IT inventor now runs a Covid early treatment fund, Martin does business and patent consulting, Kingston was a Pharma employee, and Broze calls himself an investigative journalist. They are all now on-line journalists/pundits not scientists.
☞They all promote official narratives, they speak some truths but give a lot of false information and twist narratives in a way to confuse and deceive the public to think a virus exists and exclude other important topics from their talks like 5G and other things too much to go into here. Yeadon is more complex but fits well with the others.
👉I would greatly appreciate you make a statement somewhere on your post that you misquoted me on the “superficial” issue, and on calling these others “scientists” which I did not, and add what they really do, and the issue of Mullis not having much of any bioscience work history. I personally would not just call out someone like Mullis without lots of supporting information.
Aside from Mullis, the amount of fakery that goes below the majority of stories that are put out for public consumption is incredible: viruses, the covid scam, HIV, drugs and eugenics, NASA, nukes, Einstein/the aether, fires, hurricanes, wars, money, elections….we’d be here forever. These are all in the service of the end game of the world power structure to impose a one world technocratic government. If you are in this space, you should be seeped into what that is and how Agenda 2030 is moving us towards that. Look forward to your next posts and best wishes- PM
Oh FFS! OF COURSE Kary Mullis was INDEED a FRAUD! *THAT* is the main thrust of Omar Jordan's brilliant analysis of Mullis which is at this link:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fbpYott1Mdw_BuuiE6_rjO_7Xr5Z_PdoxtK3fNZI9Gc
Furthermore, Mullis did NOT express doubts about PCR's use for "diagnosing viral diseases"!! Please CITE the SOURCE for THAT *EXACT* QUOTE from Mullis! HINT: you will NOT find any!
I am the only SCIENTIFICALLY LITERATE dissident from our old "AIDS" dissident movement who actually MET Mullis (a few times in fact) who is commenting on Mullis currently. I also helped to PRODUCE the very seminar where Mullis made those comments that are being MISINTERPRETED by simple-minded FOOLS in the present-day dissident movement!!
My bio is at: https://longtimedissident.substack.com/about and MY analyses of Mullis which are based in part on my EXPERIENCES with him in our old "AIDS" dissident movement are at this link: https://longtimedissident.substack.com/p/the-mullis-mirage and this link: https://longtimedissident.substack.com/p/was-mullis-more-machiavellian-than
Also, once Mullis' book was published, he basically stopped public participation in our old "AIDS" dissident movement. See: https://controlstudies.substack.com/p/kary-mullis-dancing-naked-in-the for more on Mullis....
Please practice what you preach and do a MUCH deeper dive into this stuff....
Hello Tammy and Bob, thanks for taking up my posts so diligently. I listened to your last post on DNA and this one of course. Let me start by making sure I am quite impressed with your work and what you try to fit in a 15-min podcast. You both speak VERY well.
Next let me paste here my exact comment on your DNA post
https://substack.com/@protonmagic/note/c-86525397
“Thanks, just listened to it. It’s a good quick overview but the devil’s in the details, literally. The link I pasted above requires patience to get thru as I’m not sure Tammy had made what is really closer to fraud than messy science crystal clear in this short talk. Debunking virology or nukes is easy-peasy compared to the DNA story. Regards.”
👉As you can see I was very positive about it and never once used the word, “superficial”, which can imply scanty. My calling it a “quick overview” is just that, you quickly went over as much as anyone can expect if you only have 15 min, and you actually covered some good ground. But it is a deep topic and since the actual basis of DNA is not even clear as you note yourselves, it has got to be more intentional manipulation than just messy science. Being the basis of so much of healthcare and bioscience the basis should be reconfirmed if the system was honest, but there is no modern reconfirmation of DNA structure and function, ergo some hidden hand seems to be holding that back.
☞How many people really have the time to read or even understand the full deal on DNA?
https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/
The conclusions I, Omar Jordan, Mia Breeze, and others made in my Mulls posts and the comment sections are NOT just based on lack of photo. It is based on the lack of photo, and as you said later the lack of papers (I think he had really only one biology paper even), and IMPORTANTLY almost total lack of any work history in bioscience.
Erlich is really the guy who made PCR into anything (though still possibly scammed it IDK for sure)
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-349-20235-5
“This is an introduction to the methods and applications of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology, a technology developed by Erlich's group at Cetus…”
Also, to clarify, I never said these folks below were “scientists”. I said,
“Just to make sure no one feels left out, yes Yeadon, Kirsch, Martin, Kingston, Corbett & Broze, and others are also very talented thespians.”
Yeadon was a Pharma employee, Kirsch an IT inventor now runs a Covid early treatment fund, Martin does business and patent consulting, Kingston was a Pharma employee, and Broze calls himself an investigative journalist. They are all now on-line journalists/pundits not scientists.
☞I have written some posts on their thinking and behavior in the Deception Agents section at the top here: https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/proton-magic-tales-of-intrigue-and-ec6
☞They all promote official narratives, they speak some truths but give a lot of false information and twist narratives in a way to confuse and deceive the public to think a virus exists and exclude other important topics from their talks like 5G and other things too much to go into here. Yeadon is more complex but fits well with the others.
👉I would greatly appreciate you make a statement somewhere on your post that you misquoted me on the “superficial” issue, and on calling these others “scientists” which I did not, and add what they really do, and the issue of Mullis not having much of any bioscience work history. I personally would not just call out someone like Mullis without lots of supporting information.
Aside from Mullis, the amount of fakery that goes below the majority of stories that are put out for public consumption is incredible: viruses, the covid scam, HIV, drugs and eugenics, NASA, nukes, Einstein/the aether, fires, hurricanes, wars, money, elections….we’d be here forever. These are all in the service of the end game of the world power structure to impose a one world technocratic government. If you are in this space, you should be seeped into what that is and how Agenda 2030 is moving us towards that. Look forward to your next posts and best wishes- PM